User agent detail

Midori/0.1.9 (X11; Linux i686; U; xx) WebKit/532+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-midori.yaml
Midori 0.1.9Linux Webkit 532desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Midori 0.1WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.1.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Midori 0.1.9closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori 0.1WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.1.9closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.021 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.1.9WebKit 532Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.1.9Webkit 532Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:53 | by ThaDafinser