User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) KHTML/4.11.4 (like Gecko) Mageia Konqueror/4.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.11Mageia KHTML 4.11.4desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.11KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.11closeMageia closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.11601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.11 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.11KHTML 4.11.4Mageia desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:53 | by ThaDafinser