User agent detail

schibstedsokbot (compatible; Mozilla/5.0; MSIE 5.0; FAST FreshCrawler 6; Contact: webcrawl@schibstedsok.no;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
FAST FreshCrawler 6 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesFAST FreshCrawlerclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.0 closeclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:53 | by ThaDafinser