User agent detail

HTC_P3400i-Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UC Browser7.2.2.51
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCP3400i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.2WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 4.01closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.2 Windows CE HTCP3400i-Mozillasmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.2.2closeWindows CE HTCP3400icloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.2.2.51 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.2Gecko Windows Mobile HTCP3400mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCP3400i (Gene)Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.053 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:52 | by ThaDafinser