User agent detail

avast/1.0.6913 (6913;de_DE) ID/1e5fd1a82be385a3 HW/HTC Desire HD A9191 Android/2.3.5 (GRJ90)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesire HD A9191 Android Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
avast 1.0.6913closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5HTCDesire HDmobile-browseryescloseclose0.24702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3HTCDesire HDsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.3.5HTCDesire HD A9191 Androidcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTC Desire HDcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 2.3.5HTCDesire HDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.048 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:52 | by ThaDafinser