User agent detail

Fly_E158/WAPBrowserProfile/MIDP2.0 Configuration/CLDC1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
FlyE158feature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Fly closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close FlyE158mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
FlyE158feature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
FlyE158mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:50 | by ThaDafinser