User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; PAP5000TDUO Build/PrestigioPAP5000TDUO) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PrestigioPAP5000TDUO Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.096 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.26303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.1PrestigioPAP5000TDUOsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0closeAndroid 4.1.1PrestigioPAP5000TDUOcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0WebKit 535.19Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 18.0Webkit 535.19Android 4.1.1PrestigioMultiphone 5000 Duomobile:smartyescloseclose0.026 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.1PrestigioPAP5000TDUOSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.057 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:49 | by ThaDafinser