User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/534.52.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.2 Safari/534.52.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_windows.yaml
Safari 5.1.2Windows XP NT 5.1 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.1WebKit WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.1.2closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.1WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1.2closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.1.2closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1.2closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.1.2WebKit 534.52.7Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 5.1.2Webkit 534.52.7Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.0.3closeen_US Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:48 | by ThaDafinser