User agent detail

LG-GM730F/IEMobile/v6.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UC Browser7.7.1.88
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGM730F Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.7WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile v6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 4.01closeWindows LGGM370mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.7 Windows CE LGGM730Fsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.7.1closeWindows CE LGGM730Fcloseclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.08201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.7.1.88 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.7Gecko Windows Mobile LGEigen GM730mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile LGGM370Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:48 | by ThaDafinser