User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.0; U; xx) Presto/2.5.24 Version/10.53
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 10.53Windows VistaPresto 2.5.24desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 10.53Presto 2.2WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.53closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 10.53closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.53Presto Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.53closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.53closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.53closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.53Presto 2.5.24Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 10.53Presto 2.5.24Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.53closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 10.00closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:48 | by ThaDafinser