User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S3850/S3850CXKD1 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/2.0 NexPlayer/3.0 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/mediaplayer.yml
NexPlayer 3.0 SamsungGT-S3850smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0Mobile Deviceyes0.053 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S3850 S3850CXKD1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.0close SamsungGT-S3850mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NexPlayer 3.0 SamsungGT-S3850smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.0close SamsungGT-S3850closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.0 Touchwiz 3.0SamsungCorby IImobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT-S3850Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:47 | by ThaDafinser