User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.30 Safari/537.36 OPR/31.0.1889.16 (Edition beta)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Beta 31.0Windows 8.1Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 31.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 31.0.1889.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 31.0.1889.16closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.22502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 31.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 31.0.1889.16closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 31.0.1889closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.30closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.13401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 31.0.1889.16WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Beta 31.0Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 31.0.1889.16closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:47 | by ThaDafinser