User agent detail

KWC-M1000/1.0.01 UP.Browser/6.2.3.9.g.1.110 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
KyoceraM1000 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
KWC-M1000 1.0.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.9.g.1.110close KyoceraM1000mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 KyoceraM1000smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close KyoceraM1000closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.9.g.1.110 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 UIQ MotorolaM1000mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close KyoceraM1000Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.104 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:45 | by ThaDafinser