User agent detail

Lenovo A2105 Linux/3.0 Android/4.0 Release/04.12.2012 DXBrowser/2.0 Profile/ Configuration/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA2105 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Lenovo closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0LenovoIdeaTab A2105mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0LenovoA2105smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.0LenovoA2105closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.0LenovoIdeaTab A2105tabletyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.081 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:44 | by ThaDafinser