User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/1.0.154.43 Safari/525.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome 1Windows VistaWebkit 525.19desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 1.0WebKit WinVista 6.0Desktop0.084 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 1.0.154.43closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 1.0.154.43closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.22502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 1.0WebKit Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 1.0.154.43closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 1.0.154closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 1.0.154.43closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 1.0.154.43WebKit 525.19Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 1Webkit 525.19Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 1.0.154.43closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 1.0.0.39closeMac OS X 10.10.5Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:44 | by ThaDafinser