User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; FreeTAB 1001 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/37.0.2062.117 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 37.0Android 4.2unknown MODECOMFreeTAB 1001Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.2MODECOMFreeTAB 1001Tabletyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.28703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 37.0.2062closeAndroid 4.2.2ModecomFreeTAB 1001closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.12401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.117WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 37Blink Android 4.2.2ModecomFreeTAB 1001tabletyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.117closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:43 | by ThaDafinser