User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; ViewPad 97Q Build/MASTER) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.138 Safari/537.36 OPR/22.0.1485.78487
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ViewsonicViewPad 97Q Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 22.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 22.0.1485.78487closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 22.0.1485.78487closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 22.0Blink Android 4.1ViewSonicViewPad 97Qtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 22.0.1485.78487closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 22.0.1485closeAndroid 4.1.1ViewsonicViewPad 97Qcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 22.0.1485.78487WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 22.0Blink Android 4.1.1ViewSonicViewPad 97qtabletyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 22.0.1485.78487closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.051 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:43 | by ThaDafinser