User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Iron/30.0.1650.0 Chrome/30.0.1650.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-097.php
Iron 30.0WinXP 5.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Iron 30.0Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.111 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1650.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Iron 30.0.1650.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iron 30.0Blink Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1650.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iron 30.0.1650closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iron 30.0.1650.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
SRWare Iron 30.0.1650.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iron 30.0Blink Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1650.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:43 | by ThaDafinser