User agent detail

Nokia1680c-2/2.0 (07.60) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Nokia1680c-2mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia1680c-2 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Nokia1680c-2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia1680c-2smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia1680c-2closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 1680c-2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia1680c-2mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia1680 classicFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:43 | by ThaDafinser