User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; Win 9x4.90)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
IE 6.0WinME MEunknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident WinME MEWindows DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeWindows 98desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows 98desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows Me closecloseclosecloseclose0.12901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:42 | by ThaDafinser