User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google Web Preview Analytics) Chrome/27.0.1453 Safari/537.36 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesGooglebot Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle Web PreviewBot/Crawler0.064 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1453close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 27.0.1453close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453WebKit 537.36 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGooglebotclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:42 | by ThaDafinser