User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; ) Opera/UCWEB7.4.0.57/69/351, SAMSUNG-GT-B3410/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.102 (GUI) MMP/2.0 Untrusted/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-B3410 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.067 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera UCWEB7.4.0.57closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.102close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.4 SamsungGT-B3410smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera UCWEB7.4.0.57close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.4.0close SamsungGT-B3410closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.4.0.57 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 Touchwiz SamsungStar Qwertymobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:42 | by ThaDafinser