User agent detail

ELinks/0.12~pre6-1ubuntu1 (textmode; Ubuntu; Linux 3.11.0-13-generic i686; 100x25-2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Elinks 0.12Ubuntu Text-based desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
ELinks 0.12 Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ELinks 0.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Elinks 0.12closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Elinks 0.12Text-based Ubuntu desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
ELinks 0.12closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ELinks 0.12~pre6-1ubuntu1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
ELinks Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ELinks 0.12 Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:42 | by ThaDafinser