User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; 2.3.5; en-us; SAMSUNG-SGH-I927 Build/GINGERBREAD) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/533.1 MyDealerApp
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-I927 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.063 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 4.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 4.0WebKit GNU/Linux SamsungSGH-I927smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeLinux SamsungSGH-I927closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 533.1Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3SamsungSGH-I927mobile:smartyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:42 | by ThaDafinser