User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Opera Mini/7.1.32052/30.3697; en-US; LG-E405) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.8.1.359 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
Opera Mini 7.1.32052GNU/Linux Presto LGE405smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.8U2 Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.1Presto GNU/Linux LGE405smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux LGE405closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.8.1.359 Linux LGLGE405closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.8Gecko LGE405mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:42 | by ThaDafinser