User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; GT-N5100 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.133 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-N5100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.1SamsungGalaxy Note 8.0Tabletyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.1SamsungGALAXY Note 8.0"tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGT-N5100closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.133WebKit 535.19Android 4.1.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Note 8.0tabletyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 25closeAndroid 4.1SamsungGT-N5100Tabletyesyescloseclose0.06 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:42 | by ThaDafinser