User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-US; RG500 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.2.0.535 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 10.2Android 4.2unknown RugGearRG500Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.2U3 Android 4.2RugGearRG500Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.2WebKit Android 4.2yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.2.0closeAndroid 4.2.2RG500closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.2.0.535WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.2Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2RG500mobile:smartyescloseclose0.07701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:41 | by ThaDafinser