User agent detail

PANTECH-C610/AIRCOM04132008 BROWSER/OBIGO/Q05A PROFILE/MIDP-20 CONFIGURATION/CLDC-11 UPLINK/631170
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PantechC610 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.072 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
PANTECH-C610 AIRCOM04132008closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM PantechC610mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q05A PantechC610smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close PantechC610closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q05A Browser Q05A closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5A PantechC610mobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close PantechC610Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:41 | by ThaDafinser