User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S8530/S8530XXLA1 Bada/2.0 AppleWebKit/534.20 Dolfin/3.0 Mobile NexPlayer/3.0 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-bada.yaml
Dolfin 3.0Bada 2.0Webkit 534.20SamsungWave IImobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.20closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 3.0closeBada 2.0SamsungGT-S8530mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NexPlayer 3.0 Bada 2.0SamsungGT-S8530smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 3.0closeBada 2.0SamsungGT-S8530closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.20 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 3.0Webkit 534.20Bada 2.0SamsungWave IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Dolfin Browser 2.2closeBada 1.2SamsungGT-S8530Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:40 | by ThaDafinser