User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_6; en-US) AppleWebKit/530.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/ Safari/530.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 0.0MacOSX 10.5unknown 530.5AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome Blink MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 530.5closeOS X 10.5.6desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome WebKit Mac 10.5desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome closeOS X 10.5.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeMac OS X 10.5.6closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome closeOS X 10.5.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome WebKit 530.5Mac OS X 10.5.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 530.5Mac OS X 10.5desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:40 | by ThaDafinser