User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2. 2.1; ja-jp; 001DL Build/FRG83) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DellStreak Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid Softbank001DLmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeAndroid DellStreakcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2. 2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2DellSTREAK 001DLtabletyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit closeLinux Softbank001DLSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.059 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:40 | by ThaDafinser