User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/18.0.1025.168 Chrome/18.0.1025.168 Safari/537.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chromium.yaml
Chromium 18.0.1025.168Linux Webkit 537.4desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 18.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.064 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.168closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 18.0.1025.168closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 18.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.015 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.168closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 18.0.1025closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.168closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 18.0.1025.168WebKit 537.4Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 18.0.1025.168Webkit 537.4Linux desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.168closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:40 | by ThaDafinser