User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 5CGSM; CPU iPhone OS 7_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 MQQBrowser/5.2.1 Mobile/11D201 Safari/8536.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-ios.yaml
QQ Browser 5.2iOS 7.1.1Webkit 537.51.2AppleiPhone 5mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit iOS 7.1AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.134 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 7.1.1AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.2WebKit iOS 7.1AppleiPhone 5Csmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeiOS 7.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.2.1closeiOS 7.1.1closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeiPhone OS 7.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.2.1WebKit 537.51.2iOS 7.1.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.2Webkit 537.51.2iOS 7.1.1AppleiPhone 5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:39 | by ThaDafinser