User agent detail

HRCrawler/2.0 (XF86; MacOS x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
HRCrawler 2.0 yesHRCrawlerBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesHRCrawlerBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesHRCrawlerclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Gecko based browser WebKit 537.31 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:39 | by ThaDafinser