User agent detail

SonyEricssonAmFiTaMiN/R8BF Browser/NetFront/3.3 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonAmFiTaMiN Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.3NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonAmFiTaMiN R8BFcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.3closeJVM AccessNetFront Ver. 3.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.3NetFront Sony EricssonAmFiTaMiNsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.3close SonyEricssonAmFiTaMiNcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Sony EricssonSony Ericsson AmFiTaMiNcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.3 Sony EricssonAmFiTaMiNmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.3close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.3Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:38 | by ThaDafinser