User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; U; Series60/5.0 Samsung i8910HD Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Safari/525
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungi8910HD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 3.0 SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.088 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4SamsungGT-I8910mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0Samsungi8910HDsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4Samsungi8910HDcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia BrowsercloseSymbianOS 9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 525Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 525Series60 5.0Samsungi8910HD Profilemobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.4SamsungGT-I8910Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:36 | by ThaDafinser