User agent detail

SonyEricssonw760i/R4EA Java/SEMC-Java/2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0, sonyericssonw760i
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonw760i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonw760i R4EAcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Sony EricssonW760imobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Java Sony Ericssonw760ifeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonw760icloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson w760icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Sony EricssonW760imobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:36 | by ThaDafinser