User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; ES9701 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.81 Safari/537.36 OPR/28.0.1764.90386
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mobile 28.0Android 4.2unknown DNSAirTab ES9701Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 28.0Blink Android 4.2DNSAirTab ES9701Tabletyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 28.0.1764.90386closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 28.0.1764.90386closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 28.0Blink Android 4.2yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 28.0.1764.90386closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 28.0.1764closeAndroid 4.2.2ES9701closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 28.0.1764.90386WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 28.0Blink Android 4.2.2ES9701tabletyescloseclose0.09501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 28.0.1764.90386closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:36 | by ThaDafinser