User agent detail

Mozilla/1.1N (X11; I; BSD/386 uname failed)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Netscape Navigator 1.1BSD/OS desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 1.1closeBSD/OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.1Nclose closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 1.1N a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Navigator 1.1 BSD/OS desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:34 | by ThaDafinser