User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; BeOS BePC; xx; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061108 BonEcho/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-beos.yaml
Firefox BonEcho 2.0BeOS Gecko 1.8.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.8Gecko 1.8 Desktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (BonEcho) 2.0closeBeOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox BonEcho (2.0)Gecko BeOS desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8closeBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Bon Echo 2.0close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
BonEcho 2.0closeBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.8.1Gecko 20061108BeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox BonEcho 2.0Gecko 1.8.1BeOS desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:33 | by ThaDafinser