User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; Sony; KDL32CX525; PKG4.008EUA; 2011;);; en) Presto/2.7.61 Version/11.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 11.00GNU/Linux Presto SonyKDL32CX525tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.00Presto 2.7Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.00closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.00Presto GNU/Linux SonyKDL32CX525tv0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeSony 2011SonyKDL32CX525closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.0Presto 2.7.61Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 2.9Presto 2.7.61 SonyBravia CX525 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:33 | by ThaDafinser