User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 P900i(c100;TB;W24H11) (compatible; ichiro/mobile goo;+http://search.goo.ne.jp/option/use/sub4/sub4-1/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
yesIchiro Mobile BotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesIchiro Mobile BotBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesichiro/mobileclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesichiroCrawler0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
P900icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.52405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGooclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesgooclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:33 | by ThaDafinser