User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; AirTab P970g Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.92 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 41.0Android 4.0unknown DNSAirTab P970gTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.0DNSAirTab P970gTabletyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.92closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.92closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.28703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.0tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.92closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.0.2272closeAndroid 4.0.4DNSAirTab P970gcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.92WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Android 4.0.4AirTab P970gtabletyescloseclose0.10401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.92closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:33 | by ThaDafinser