User agent detail

Opera/9.20 (Windows 98; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.20Windows 98 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.20Presto 2.0Win98 98Windows DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.20closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.20closeWindows 98desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.20Presto Windows 98desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.20closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.20closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.20closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.20 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.20 Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.20closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:32 | by ThaDafinser