User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 P904i( m65bot/0.1; c; http://m65.jp/bot.html )
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
m65bot 0.1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesm65botBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.17602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.016 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesm65botclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
P904icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo P904icloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:32 | by ThaDafinser