User agent detail

chompSMS 5.97 (9059722) [Model Number: Archos 80 Xenon, Android OS version: 3.4.0+, Device ID: c989a15e13a99ee08b5485dac5f68244, Origin: 170141051, Firmware Version: 16]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Archos80 Xenon, Android OS version: 3.4.0+, Device ID: c989a15e13a99ee08b5485dac5f68244, Origin: 170141051, Firmware Version: 16] Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
chompSMS closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android Archos80smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid Archos80 Xenon, Android OS version: 3.4.0+, Device ID: c989a15e13a99ee08b5485dac5f68244, Origin: 170141051, Firmware Version: 16]closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.22902 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.092 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:32 | by ThaDafinser