User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-us; KFOT Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.8 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Silk 3.8Android unknownunknown AmazonKindle Fire 7Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.8WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire 7Tabletyesyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.29603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 3.8Blink Android AmazonKindle Firetabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.8closeAndroid AmazonKindle Firecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.8WebKit 535.19Fire OS AmazonKindle Fire (2nd Gen)closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.8Webkit 535.19FireOS 2AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.8closeAndroid AmazonKFOTTabletyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:31 | by ThaDafinser