User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.4 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-318.php
Chrome 31.0MacOSX 10.8unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.4closeOS X 10.8.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Mac 10.8desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.4closeOS X 10.8.5closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeMac OS X 10.8.5closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.4closeOS X 10.8.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.4WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.8.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink OS X Mountain Lion 10.8desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.4closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:30 | by ThaDafinser