User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-B2710D/B2710DDDJJ2 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/2.0 QTV/5.3 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-B2710D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0Mobile Deviceyes0.066 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-B2710D B2710DDDJJ2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.0close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 2.0WebKit SamsungGT-B2710Dsmartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.0close SamsungGT-B2710Dcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.0 SamsungGT-B2710Dmobile:featureyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:30 | by ThaDafinser