User agent detail

Lenovo-A680/V1 Linux/3.4.5 Android/4.2.2 Release/01.09.2014 Browser/AppleWebKit534.30 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mobile Safari/534.30;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA680 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA680mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2LenovoA680smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA680closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2LenovoA680mobile:smartyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:29 | by ThaDafinser